Juan Cruz Martin Manzano vs Jonas Gundacker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Aug at 12:49 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Cruz Martin Manzano vs J. Gundacker

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Manzano 1 - 0 Gundacker
They have played 2 sets in total, with Juan Cruz Martin Manzano winning 2 and Jonas Gundacker winning 0. The last match between Juan Cruz Martin Manzano and Jonas Gundacker was at the M15 Slovenska Bistrica, 07-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Juan Cruz Martin Manzano getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Manzano | 1 |
| Gundacker | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Slovenska Bistrica(08-07-25)
J. C. M. Manzano vs J. Gundacker H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.66% (75-41) | Career Total W/L | 59.72% (43-29) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. C. M. Manzano vs J. Gundacker Match Preview:
- Which player has a better second serve performance in recent months? Gundacker leads with 41.09%, slightly outperforming Manzano, who has a 38.74% success rate.
- In return games, Gundacker also shows superiority, winning 49.16% of points on the opponent's second serve, compared to Manzano's 42.74%.
- For first serve returns, Gundacker slightly edges ahead, capturing 32.2% of points versus Manzano's 30.64%.
- Can under-pressure performance offer insights? Gundacker saves 56.6% of breakpoints when under pressure, while Manzano saves 47.83%.
- Which player has a higher win percentage in the last year? Manzano has a marginally higher win percentage at 61.11%, compared to Gundacker's 59.18%.
- Both players excel on clay surfaces; however, Gundacker has no success on hard courts, with a 0% win rate (0/2).
- Is the level of opponents they face noteworthy? Manzano has faced players ranked on average 264.3, whereas Gundacker has competed against stronger opponents, average ranked 98.18.
- If a match reaches a deciding set, Gundacker is predicted to have a higher chance of success, winning 44% of such sets compared to Manzano's 36%.
- What about break point conversion? Manzano has a slight edge, converting 39.74% of opportunities compared to 37.1% for Gundacker.
Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):
As we delve into the tennis statistics for Manzano and Gundacker, several key performance indicators emerge that highlight each player's strengths and weaknesses.
Gundacker's superior second serve performance and return game capabilities indicate a robust baseline strategy. Their ability to handle pressure and save breakpoints at a higher rate reinforces their advantage, particularly in close matches or critical moments.
Despite Manzano's slightly higher overall win percentage and break point conversion rate, these are overshadowed by Gundacker's capacity to perform against stronger-ranked opponents and excel in deciding sets.
With this in mind, Gundacker is the likely winner for the upcoming match, as their statistics suggest a more consistent and effective play style.
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano vs Jonas Gundacker Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. C. M. Manzano vs J. Gundacker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:49:44 | Average Match Time | 0:49:44 |
| 62% (16/26) | 1st Serve % | 58% (22/38) |
| 88% (14/16) | 1st Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 70% (7/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 61% (23/38) | Return Points Win % | 19% (5/26) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. C. M. Manzano Recent Matches Played
J. Gundacker Recent Matches Played

J. C. M. Manzano vs J. Gundacker Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.66% (75/41) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.72% (43/29) |
| 63.57% (164/94) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.15% (97/67) |
| 56.33% (1312/1017) | Games Win/Loss | 54.34% (857/720) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 64.66% (75/41) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.76% (42/26) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 113 | Aces Total | 42 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 307 | Total Double Faults | 47 |
| 1:19:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 302.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 159.88 |
| 66% (3547/5389) | 1st Serve % | 53% (810/1530) |
| 62% (2205/3547) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (496/810) |
| 47% (862/1842) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (324/720) |
| 53% (344/652) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (65/169) |
| 46% (2467/5382) | Return Points Win % | 41% (663/1606) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.37% (75/38) | Futures W/L | 59.72% (43/29) |
| 65% (74/114) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (43/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (9/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 46% (12/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 91% (76/69) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (42/39) |
| 8% (76/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (42/3) |
| 15% (40/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (30/4) |